About us
Hello Everyone,
Thanks for stopping by. My whole life the sexual teachings of the Church did not make any sense to me. How in the world did God created wonderful Sexual pleasure that he said was "Excellent" become a "sin". Did not make any sense to me. God put all creation on the earth 100% nudist. God wants all creation to be nudist. So how in the world are we doing 100% opposite of what God wants.
When it comes to sexuality human are almost 100% opposite of God desire.
God want all creation to be nudist. Church is negative about nudity. If you walk in most churchs nude they will kick you out.
God promoted polygamy in the Bible. But today the church calls polygamy a sin and say you can only have one wife. opposite of God.
God gave sexual freedom to all creation at creation. But today church condemn any and all sexual freedoms and say you can only have sex inside one man one women marriage. Opposite of God.
God clearly show in Lev 15:16-18 that masturbation is NOT a sin. Church want to put shame and guilt trips on everyone because they have personal sexuality enjoyment. Opposite of God.
The church has the wrong definitions for fornication or sexual immorality, wrong definition for adultery, and lust, and misunderstand most all sex terms in the Bible. They totally take verses out of context.
As a results the Church has created the wrong plan of Salvation by saying NOT Jesus alone, but they say Jesus plus anti-nudity, plus anti-sexual freedom, plus anti sex outside of one man one women in order to go to heaven. Totally opposite of God. Church has become a anti-sex cult.
Going to Church Sunday school i learned about King David "man after God own heart" had many wives and concubines over 20. Solomon, "wisest man on earth with God's special wisdom", i learned had over 1000 wives and concubines.
Then i go into church service and learn today we can only have one wife and no concubines. Did not make any sense to me.
So in short i have been to Bible College to become a Pastor and have spent thousands of hours reseaching the Bible and hundreds of hours reseaching "sex in the Bible" and truth about sexualtiy that is almost opposite what i was told from the local church.
To correctly study any Bible subject, epecially sexuality , you alway start at the Bigining and go forward. But the church did the opposite, they started in the NT and when backward and came up with backward thinking about sexuality. Taken totally out of proper context and totally misunderstood truth and they intentionly use wrong sexual word definitions to mislead people.
When you go back in history and study when the Catholic Church was very corrupt and want a lot of money to build churchsfrom "indulgence money " they make people pay money for their personal sins and to get lot more money they declare sex to be a sin to get more money.
We still have the wrong sex word definitions today, misleading people thinking sex is a sin, when it is NOT. This has been pasted down for generations.
How do we get free from these lies and correct the wrong definition for the sex word terms we have been wrongly told wrong definitions.
How Sex Was Made A Sin?
Also, Check out: http://inkaboutit4u.com/?p=Web_Pages_List
How Sex Was Made A Sin? http://www.libchrist.com/bible/howsexsin.html
How Sex Was Made A Sin
Part of http://www.libchrist.com/bible/adultery.html
Augustine in about 300 A.D. was a primary shaper of theological thought and went so far as to argue that sex was sinful even within wedlock unless the specific purpose was always conception! This reflects the need at the time for many more children. Infant mortality was very high and the economic and political structures were based on families.
Thanks to widespread illiteracy - or apathy - whatever the church said was now law. Intercourse was no longer natural and good; sex was dirty and only for procreation. Celibacy was the new standard for the clergy. And it was a great money maker! If you sinned by enjoying sex, you must come to the church for repentance, which required a donation to demonstrate your faith. What a perfect way for the church to raise capital: make everyone a sinner because of innate sexual desires and then offer to absolve them for a sizeable donation.
Making polygamy a "sin" was a slow process. Before the 12th century it was common for Catholic priests to have multiple wives and mistresses. Pope Gregory II in 726 said "when a man has a sick wife who cannot discharge the marital function, he may take a second one, provided he looks after the first one." Later, with concerns for protecting Church property from inheritance, Pope Pelagius I made new priests agree that offspring could not inherit Church property. Pope Gregory then declared all sons of priests illegitimate (only SONS since lowly daughters could not inherit anyway).
In 1022 Pope Benedict VIII banned marriages and mistresses for priests and in 1139 Pope Innocent II voided all marriages of priests and all new priests had to divorce their wives. This had nothing to do with morality (multiple women for males had long been the norm since before biblical times), but it was about MONEY!
http://www.libchrist.com/http://www.libchrist.com/Liberated Christians
Cyber Swing/Polyamory Resource Center
Promoting Intimacy and Other-Centered Sexuality
How Sex Was Made A Sin
A huge number of other Christians who now are enjoying more open relationships, more living in Christ's love. But many have struggled with exactly the same issues that many who visit our site are concerned about. Centuries of indoctrination by traditional Christian teachings are hard to overcome. But the sex negative traditions clearly have no biblical basis.
Jews (the group out of which Jesus preached) do not have the same sexual hang ups that today's traditional Christians (vs Biblical) have. They view sex in a much more wholesome way than most Christians.Christians borrow their negative view of sex from the Greeks and also from St. Augustine who over-reacted to his previous sexual progligacy with his ascetic responses that mad sex totally evil even when it was used in marriage for sexual reasons. It was only valid if it was for the purpose of procreation. Now, if that is the only use you make of sex then you are in sympathy with St. Augustine. That is a sorry place to put your loyalty.
Regarding Christ, I believe that his silence indicates a wholesome acceptance of Jewish openness about the subject. Christians(?) are too often in tune with negativism and not open to honesty about their own sexuality and, as a result, so many of them end up in deviancy. Sex is not a disease. It is a gift from God. That does not mean that we use it carelessly. Many traditional Christians have a lot to work out on a psychological level sexual issues, before they can engage in dialogue with honest, searching Christians eager to find solutions to the errors created by organized religious fanatics.
The Emperor Constantine (354-430 A.D.) was perhaps the world's most important convert to the new religion of Christianity. Christianity was perhaps the only thing left to try to hold the Roman Empire together. While the political empire fell in the next century, the Church stepped in as the new central authority. Threats of burning in hell were even more effective than the army for controlling large and diverse populations.
Augustine was a primary theological shaper of thought and went so far as to argue that sex was sinful even within wedlock unless the specific purpose was always conception! This reflects the need at the time for many more children. Infant mortality was very high and the economic and political structures were based on families. Likewise, clerical celibacy was in part shaped by fear that offspring would fight over Church property.
Thanks to widespread illiteracy - or apathy -whatever the Church said was now law. Intercourse was no longer natural and good; sex was dirty and only for procreation. Celibacy was the new standard for the clergy. And it was a great money maker! If you sinned by enjoying sex, you must come to the Church for repentance, which required a donation to demonstrate your faith. What a perfect way for the Church to raise capital; make everyone a sinner because of their innate sexual desires and then offer to absolve them for a sizeable donation.
The sexual morality of Christianity did not come from Jesus. It instead came from later Christians whose main interest was the control of the masses. It is important to recognize the source of religious dogma about sex - when and where it came from - and put it in perspective in present time and circumstances.
Making polygamy a "sin" was a slow process. It was even common for Catholic priests to have multiple wives and mistresses. Pope Gregory II in a decretal in 726 said "when a man has a sick wife who cannot discharge the marital function, he may take a second one, provided he looks after the first one." Later, with concerns for protecting Church property from inheritance, Pope Pelagius I made new priests agree that offspring could not inherit Church property. Pope Gregory then declared all sons of priests illegitimate (only sons since lowly daughters could not inherit anyway).
In 1022 Pope Benedict VIII banned marriages and mistresses for priests and in 1139 Pope Innocent II voided all marriages of priests and all new priests had to divorce their wives. This had nothing to do with morality (multiple women for males had long been the norm since before biblical times), but it was about MONEY!
Polygyny (many wives for 1 man) was the norm due to the male-dominated society and the fact a man's status was determined by the number of children he fathered. Today, women should enjoy equal rights and sex can be for pleasure and an expression of sincere love. This makes polyamory a more equal and loving lovestyle.
For much more detailed historic information on how sex became a sin see:
http://www.patriarchywebsite.com/monogamy/mono-history.htm in addition to the overall site, http://www.patriarchywebsite.com which has a great deal of historical sexual information especially related to Jews.
The Liberated Christian Sexual Ethic
We affirm that our sexuality is a natural gift from God. It should not be artificially restricted by regulation. God honors a free sexual expression that seeks the enjoyment and good of the each person, and the glory to God as He participates with us in this glorious aspect of living and loving others, ourselves and God. In our scriptural understanding, a New Testament biblical argument cannot be made against most cases of consensual sexual pleasure sharing, whether premarital, marital, or postmarital.
Negative cases can be made only if the parties involved are not functioning within Christian love guidelines, but are rather using one another for their own selfish gratification or are doing harm, physical or psychological, to their sexual partners or to other parties who are involved. Among the sexual practices which would be harmful would be the careless disregard for sexually transmitted diseases or contraceptive protection.
